September, 2008

Collaboration Part 2: Sharing is necessary

Following from my previous post about attributing works used, I find it exceedingly frustrating when working with students who fear that someone else will ‘steal their work’.  In much of the teaching I do, I work with wikis.  Allowing students to see how other students work is important for learning.  I get a real kick out of watching how they finally realise the importance of someone besides me reading their work.  But I have not yet been able to overcome the competitive spirit of the university system here in Australia.  Everyone competes for a high grade and, until recently, there was a limit to the number of high grades (criterion based marking rulez!).

With the realisation that criterion and norm based marking are pretty well incompatable, comes the ability to lessen the competition for grades.  With that comes the potential for more collaborative endeavours.  But, and this is the whole point, students still have a fear of not getting their fair share of marks.  I know I had to prop up some of my peers as I waded through the jungle of undergraduate learning and I know there are people who would like a free ride, so I have to compromise and allocate individual marks to a collaborative endeavour.  But we still see students really concerned about losing their work.

Student Contributions to the Table of Contents page

Student Contributions to the Table of Contents page

Enter History Flow from IBM.  This is the first semester I have had access to the whole setup for my wiki course.  I can get into the database, I can extract what I want when I want[1].  But I can see the potential of using History Flow in helping students understand the ways in which their contribution can be seen and assessed, I think I can move them to deeper collaborative efforts.  I think these kinds of visualisation[2] help them to see what they otherwise might not have.

  1. provided I can work out why I max out the CPU setting and close off the site every time I do []
  2. which I’m sure I first saw on FlowingData []

Collaboration Part 1: Attribution is important

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about collaboration in learning and, in particular, collaboration between students of different cultures.  There seems to be a few obstacles, at least in the Australian setting.  Approximately 25% of students  at Griffith are international and I suspect it is much higher in the post-graduate courses.  Last semester, in one postgraduate course I taught, there were 3 local students out of more than 100.  This semester, I have about 4 out of 40.  That’s a significant number.

But the problems that I really want to solve are the cultural differences, not just between students, but the difference between the expectations of academia and the expectations of the so-called remix culture.  It seems to me, that the students I deal with are not yet of that culture (no, not even the Gen-Y students) and their understanding of key aspects of technological change is sadly lacking.

The manifestation of the remix culture in academia seems to have become what I have termed the ‘copy and paste collective’ and while the two seem almost the same, the fundamental difference is the attribution aspect of the process.  When we copy a piece of music, we can almost hear the attribution.  If we know the music in that genre, we know where it comes from.  It can be less obvious when it comes to text. But the same action is viewed less favourable.  You just can’t copy and paste in academia.  There’s a whole slew of actions that must accompany that.

I think the creative commons movement is helpful in this respect. Unpacking remix rights into attribution, derivation and commercialisation makes it easier to explain the whole heap of ways to use things.  I think we need to emphasis to student these different parts of using other work.  Most academic work, and the way it is used within academia is By-NC.  You must acknowledge where it came from (attribution), but you may not use it commercially (generally speaking, there may be exceptions).

This is not what I started out to write about, but the next post will deal with the fears that students have about others ‘stealing’ their work.  That’s kind of ironic when so many of them forget to attribute the information they have used.

Tags: , ,

Doing the other things that interest me

I’ve spent the week (well most of it) finishing off the design of the Campus Club website.  It’s the first site I’ve designed since early in my PhD (aside from this one and it still needs work).   I love playing with web design but I just don’t have much time.  And because I don’t have much time, it takes me ages to remember everything.  Someone suggested I have an eye for design, but I’m not sure.  It usually takes multiple insights from other people to get it to a point that really looks good.  Which is ironic, because I ask people what they thing and they say yeah, that looks good.  My niece suggested on an earlier version that it needed more black.  I think it wasn’t MySpace enough, but we ended with more green to evoke the bush feeling around the club.  It’s a great place to have a few on Friday arvos.

The design still has to be passed by the committee, and it’s anybodies guess whether they will see it in the same light as Laurence (the manager) and me.  Laurence actually had a lot of input into the colouring, which I think finally works well.  Very earthy.

I’m also trying to finish the last few changes on a paper that’s been accepted to IJOB.  I’m pleased the paper was accepted, but I’m not still not sure of the contribution it’s made.  I suppose it’s mainly that it brings some disparate views together and highlights processes and strategies that could improve the use of email in organisations.  I’m not sure why, but that’s the part I always get stuck on … my contribution to knowledge.  I know I struggled with that in my PhD and just about all the other papers I’ve written (except for Wiki Pedagogy – see Wiki Pedagogy in colour that one was easy).

The reviewers want to see that part more clearly.  Now if only I could see it myself.

Tags: ,

Well, that went okay

I was told after my guest lecture yesterday, that I had ‘lived up to expectations’.  Gee, I’ll have to try harder, I really wanted to exceed expectations.  Seems people expect a lot of me.

I’ve actually tried to make a movie/animationy thing of my slides, but I haven’t quite got the settings right.  I think I need to play with the new version of Keynote a bit more.  Nevertheless, I am going to upload the smaller version, even though the effect is not as good as it was IRL.  It’s a click through movie, so you need to click for each new slide.  That’s not something I knew you could do.

E-learning lecture

I had fun doing it, and some of the students were very engaged, so that’s a win-win as far as I’m concerned.

I wonder if there’s a better way of getting these things uploaded with a smaller file size and better resolution.

Tags:

Guest Lecture in e-learning

Today, I’m introducing HR&Training students to kewl stuff in e-Learning.  Not sure how I’ll go, but I’ve been instructed to include the newer things that are happening in the area.  I think this will be fun!

Tags:

Theme by RoseCityGardens.com
Modified by Me!