December, 2008

Happy New Year … or something

So it’s the end of one arbitrarily defined time period and the beginning of another.  I often question why we have this moment when everything becomes new again, or so the theory goes.  What does it mean when everything is focused into one moment?

Over the last few years, I’ve found it much more compelling to contemplate the sunrise on the first of January.  That seems more indicative of newness to me.  I know there are all sorts of old traditions that dictate that midnight is symbolic, but that symbolism seems less relevant in our current age.  I don’t know of anyone who still celebrates with the First Foot so why do other traditions persist when some fall by the wayside?

I was just discussing traditions with a friend and we were pondering the nature of changes in what’s defined as appropriate, both online and off, and we both expressed concern over the remaking of the female image under a male gaze.  It raises questions about what changes have happened and are now being pushed forward.  Things like defining the naked body as only sexual.  I keep hearing comments from our so-called leaders about how disgusting certain images are, and now topless sunbathing is being labelled as revolting.  Personally, I think sunbathing is revolting but that’s because I live in Queensland, the skin cancer captial of the world.  It’s not the topless part that’s the problem, it’s the framing of attractiveness and health in terms of suntan.  I think that is the problem.

The whole reframing of the body was a part of the feminist movement, but it’s been usurped by the far-right.  Think about brazillians and the implication of pre-pubescence that comes with that.  The hairlessness of our current standards of beauty evoke immaturity – an immature female body.  Now who’s being disgusting?

So I really think it’s important that we not implement puritanical standards of imagery on the web.  I really think that there is a line and we are so far from it, that it’s unlikely we will cross it[1].  We need to become comfortable with ourselves.  Our politicians are not.  I hope they loosen up and realise that their morality is not mine (and probably not yours).  I will work towards keeping our ability to appreciate the human body, it does, after all, have a certain beauty, but one that is being manipulated by so many different forces that it will be hard to unravel.

In this new year, lets contemplate the ways in which we have moved forward, and the forces that are holding us back, both personally and socially.  Oh, and don’t forget politically.  Those forces should never be ignored.

Have a good one!

  1. of course, if you manipulate your search terms, you can find some pretty disgusting stuff, but generally, you won’t find it if you don’t go looking and you don’t have spyware on your computer []

Tags: , ,

This website is rated N for nocleanfeed

So we’ll all be expected to rate our websites according to some externally imposed criteria.  This should help with the (no)cleanfeed.  Just think of how well it will work if all they have to implement is a simple check of the rating.  Of course, unrated pages will probably be rejected so there goes 99% of the web. It would be trivial, I suppose, to include nocleanfeed as a category for rejection.  There goes Twitter! And this blog.[1]

I mean, come on!  Whose standards are we talking about? Why should I or anybody else, for that matter, be bound by the vagaries of political … vagaries. It’s just a stupid fucking idea![2]

I know, I can’t use that as an argument and have any credibility.  I guess it’s time to start writing my next paper about the implications of censorship on education[3].  I really should do a Google Scholar search and check out the fabulous Libertus.net.  I know there’s a lot I don’t know.  But that applies to almost everything.

I’ve started a single page wiki to try and gather all of the issues.  Sort of like a summary of things that would need to be covered.  I thought about using action research, but it would be action research about the web, if that’s even possible.  I’m not sure.  My action research books are at work and I’m on leave[4].

This will build on my previous post about Evidenced Based Research, because that phrase just darned-well pisses me off!

  1. not that too many people would notice, but I digress. []
  2. Oh noes, I forgot to include a language warning! []
  3. not that I’ve completely finished the last paper about censorship and literacy []
  4. so why am I thinking about writing, oh yeah, the rest of the year is taken up with teaching! []

Tags: , ,

Passion: 3 things

I was watching the TED videos the other day.  I finally got around to setting up an RSS feed for them and ended up with 357 items in my reader.  I love the TED videos and often use one or two in my classes.  They seem to say things in more compelling ways than I can, and grab the attention of students.  But one of them got me thinking about an issue that has been plaguing me for some time – somewhere in the vacinity of 5 years.  That talk was Tony Robbins: Why we do what we do, and how we can do it better. From reading the comments, I get that people either love him or hate him.  I’ve heard the name before, but had not really paid attention.  The thing that got me was that this talk connected to me at the level of that 5+ year old issue – the issue of what I really want to do with my life.  I keep thinking that I have lost the passion for things, but the problem isn’t that I don’t have passion, it’s that it’s very diverse and in the moment.  Things affect me NOW and I latch onto that – sometimes following through, sometimes not.

So I suppose I’m really at the stage of working out what issues are really important and which are worth my time.  What things do I want to focus on.  The video allowed me to contemplate that.  This post is an attempt to qualify that – to give shape and form to the things that really matter. Read more of Passion: 3 things

Tags: , ,

The slow criminalisation of us all

I received another email today from the EFA stop censorship list pointing to Yet Another Call for Censorship (YACfC) and rating of Internet sites. It’s rather ironic that these calls receive any airtime, because they are essentially pointing to the criminalisation of large portions of the population and the infantalisation of us all.

In relatively recent times, in Australia, we have had changes in copyright law which resulted in the criminalisation of a large proportion of the population because it’s now against the law the watch a recorded video more than once (among other things).  How many of us record something and just watch it once?  But, with the wisdom of ages, it was deemed that this activity was not lawful.  Time shifting of content is only a once off affair.  How could anyone think that a recording of a TV program which one day could be kept indefinitely and watched frequently while the next was illegal was worthy of a legislative change?

We’re now facing a global challenge to what is considered okay.  Going is our ability to choose what we do when we use the Internet, most notably the World Wide Web (which is not equivalent, but let’s not let technicalities get in the way).  Why does anyone think it’s appropriate to restrict what is available on the web – which, I might add, is a grown ups place!  The majority of internet users are adults[1].  Why is it that we, the adults of the world, get to surf a kiddy internet instead of the real internet?

It struck me this morning that there has been a trend in parenting that is perhaps partly responsible for the current shifts.  Helicopter parents try to control every aspect of their children’s lives, every decision, every mistake.  Children (and we’re talking about 20 somethings here) need to have their parents ring their employer, their bank, their credit agencies, because they are children and cannot make decisions.  This is the kind of thinking that we are dealing with.  These Helicopter Parents, grounded in the benefit of growing up making their own mistakes, want to save their children from the pain of those mistakes[2].  Why would anyone want their children to remain children for so long?  Is this a response to empty nest syndrome?

But the thing that really struck me as I contemplated censorship and helicopter parents is that we are now entering an era of Helicopter Governance.[3]  Gone will be our ability to make mistakes and to learn from them.  No more will we be at risk of losing, of being hurt.  In its place will be laws for our protection, laws that make adults criminal.

I often contemplate what I would do if I ever did happen to find some child sexual abuse material[4] on the internet.  Would I be able to report it? Would I be able to do anything to protect that child?  Can I safely report that to the Police for investigation? Or will I be investigated for viewing child p0rn?  Will I have my life turned upside down in an effort to save the children from being saved?

Please, I’m 47.  I’m an adult.  I want to take risks.  I want to learn from my mistakes.  I want to push the boundaries of what it is to know, what we can learn from each other.  Don’t make me a criminal for doing my that!

  1. okay, I made that statistic up, but I’m pretty sure it’s correct and it has as much legitimacy as any of the fear mongering stats []
  2. among other things []
  3. See here for another example. []
  4. aka child p0rn []

Tags: , , ,

Social Networking and Me

Someone recently suggested that they “stalked” me across multiple web services and it got me to thinking which services I have actually signed up to and which I continue to use.  Between then and now, my cat died, a friend’s house burnt down and another friend had her PhD draft[1] torn to shreds, so I didn’t quite get to it.  It seems to have been A Bad Week (TM) after the high at the beginning with my sister’s graduation.

Below, I have listed most of the social networking sites I use or that are well known. Social networking websites are an interesting phenomena.  I find myself rather bemused at times, but do see their attractions.  I see myself as a peripheral participant in most of them, and sometimes that leads to a sense of voyeurism that is kind of weird.  I have a horror of being watched so perhaps it’s not surprising that I tend to stick to the sidelines when I do get involved.

I’ve broken it up into Things I don’t use, Things I do use and Other things I have used but don’t really keep up with. I think I got them all, but who knows where I’ve signed up in the past.

Read more of Social Networking and Me

  1. actually, just the first sentence of it, but where do you go from there? []

Tags:

Theme by RoseCityGardens.com
Modified by Me!