April, 2009

finding focus

I’ve been playing around with this blog for quite some time now and I still haven’t found a particular focus.  There are way too many things that I think about and way too many things that I do.  There are way too many ideas that I find interesting and way too many things that I want to do.

I think I should document some of them and find the common thread, even though I think I know what that thread is, it’s too nebulous.  I think I need to develop some coherence, so when people ask ‘what’s this blog about?’, the answer is more than ‘stuff’.

So what AM I interested in?

  1. Learning
  2. Technology
  3. Technology for facilitating learning (AKA learning technology)
  4. Internet technologies (the shiny)
  5. Things that go beep in the day
  6. Things that make connections easier (although I am less than likely to use those connections)
  7. Following trends
  8. Not necessarily ‘being first’ but ‘being there’
  9. Facilitating learning
  10. Learning how people learn
  11. Learning how people learn about technology
  12. How people share ideas
  13. Soaking up the wealth of information/knowledge that’s out there
  14. The intersection between what I know and what you know
  15. Everything around that intersection
  16. Things that prevent people from learning (the flip side of filtering technologies)

So with all that, you’d think I’d have plenty to say.  Why am I not saying it?  Possibly because of points 6, 7 and 8.  The connections between what we know (point 14), individually, are endlessly fascinating.  But, it seems that I have these whole conversations in my head, vicarious conversations, and I never get around to writing them down.

I wonder if there’s a plug in for wordpress that can take vague thoughts and make them into a coherent post.  Now that’s something I’d be ‘first’ to!

Here’s a trumpet

I received an email from the Dean of Teaching and Learning the other day, and didn’t quite get around to responding.  Someone mentioned that they had dobbed me in for this particular email, so I responded in the positive.  The reason for the email is secondary, because I took the opportunity to blow my own trumpet, something I am not really good at.  But apparently it worked.

I included in the email an apology for not responding and gave a link to the reason.  That reason was the time spent on developing the presentation for the lecture this week.  I think that was a good move, because, now, at least one person is impressed by the work that I do.

My next trick was to try to embed the outcome of all that activity here.  One plug-in installation later and here it is.

Specifying the size in the code didn’t seem to have an effect, so if that’s too small, you can view it full size.

Can you hear my trumpet?

Learning Kinemac 4 – Using multiple cameras

In the previous tutorial, we created multiple objects and then grouped them to form a simple animation.  In this tutorial, we will duplicate that group and use two different cameras to view parts of the animation.

Lengthening your animation

Open the file you created in the last tutorial.  You will have grouped the objects at the end of the last tutorial giving you a grouped sprite of 1000 ticks in an animation of 800 ticks.  We’re going to need a longer time frame for this tutorial so the first thing to do is to lengthen the animation.  On the Stage tab of the Inspector Panel, change the Animation Duration to 1600 ticks.  This lengthens the whole animation but does not affect the sprites you have already created.

Duplicate your group

Using the same method, as in the previous tutorial, copy your group (command+C) and paste (command+v) it into the sprite window.  This gives you an animation with two sets of objects moving together.  You can drag the whole group along the timeline (say 100 ticks) and have the second set of objects moving separately from the first.

Viewing from two different angles

One of the powerful ways that Kinemace helps animators is through the use of multiple cameras.  We are going to create two camera sprites so we can view the animation from two points of view.  Go to the Objects Menu and select Camera or press control+option+command+C.  This will place a camera sprite at the Time Marker.  If you stopped your animation at a random point and your camera sprite is placed there, you can simply drag the camera sprite to the point you want it to start.  The camera sprite will have the default length of 800 ticks so in the sprite tab of the Inspector Panel, reset the duration of the sprite to 1600 (the same as the whole animation). Note that the end of the sprite also changes to 1600.  You can also change that value and the duration will change automatically.  We’ll leave the position settings for that as they are.

Create a second camera sprite, and lengthen it to 1600 ticks too.  Change the Eye settings in the sprite tab of the Inspector Window to x = 400, y = 400, and z = 800.  This will offset the camera to the objects to give a different view.  Later, you can change those values to see the effect of the camera position.  If you play your animation now, it will appear no different from the original.  When the cameras were created, they appeared at the bottom of the sprite window and are automatically aimed at objects directly below them in the sprite window.  What we need to do is aim each camera at separate groups of objects.  We can move the camera to above the object or group of objects that we would like to focus on. So, move each camera to above a different group of sprites as indicated.word-stage

Change your view to Sprite Movable Cameras (from the Views Menu or press S).  You can now see your animation using the two cameras.  One group of objects will be moving toward you while the other is moving diagonally across the stage.

You can improve the animation by offsetting one group from the other simply by dragging the beginning of the group to 100 ticks. Now you have two sets of objects moving through different spaces and at different times.

Completing the animation

At the beginning, we lengthened the animation to 1600 ticks.  We also created the cameras at 1600 ticks long.  But, with our sprites only 800 ticks, we have a long bare stage showing at the end.  We can fill this simply by copying each group of objects and pasting them at the end of the original.  Note that if you allow Kinemac to place them at the bottom of the sprite window, they will all appear as viewed by your second camera.  To fix this, drag one group of objects to above the Camera-different settings sprite.  Be careful of placement as you want the cameras to see the objects.  Move them around to see the effect of placement of sprites and cameras.

Kinemac gives you many options with the camera sprites allowing the development of more complex animations.  This tutorial introduced multiple cameras.  The next tutorial will start to investigate the animation of the sprite cameras.

Enjoy!

Thinking … now with fewer consequences

I keep coming back to the issue of ‘filtering’ the internet that is most concerning to me.  I don’t care so much about morals – everyone has a different set; and I’m not that convinced of the technology – it will improve or not as it always does.  What concerns me most is the effect that a filtered feed from all sources will have on us as a society and as individuals within that society.

It’s not so much that Big Brother is watching us 1984-style, it’s that we won’t be able to think our way clear on any issue. It’s not that we will have ‘thoughtcrimes’, it’s that we won’t have thoughts.  Our perceptions, our knowledge, our reality will be reduced to whatever it is that we can access.  Mindless facebooking, linking stuff, grabbing stuff, accumulating links[1].  It’s like the EPIC thing, the Evolving Personalised Information Construct.

But, where EPIC2014 hints at the commercialisation of the process, the current filtering proposals don’t even give us the option of anything evolving.  Anything not appropriate will be filtered, we won’t have any choice.

We’re already seeing people mindlessly buying stuff on the internet, witness the Beijing Ticketing scam[2].  It’s that idea of ‘functional literacy’ in a hyperconnected world.  People believe what they want to believe, they read what they want to read.  But sometimes there is no thought behind the reading.  There is no way for them to fully participate in the business of living.  Hence we have people losing thousands of dollars to scammers, and not just any people, but even the tech savvy[3].

The idea that anything bad for us should be filtered, that children should be protected from accidentally realising that maybe, just maybe, their parents have sex, is quite disconcerting.  Or is that the point of the filters – children shouldn’t even think that sex is normal[4].

I wonder at what will become of our ability to think when we have a clean feed.  Here is your box, think inside it.  Outside is bad, very bad.

Perhaps there is a better way.

  1. I shouldn’t talk, my delicious is way big []
  2. I would link to it, but it was taken down []
  3. once that paper is published, I’ll insert a link to this stuff []
  4. yes, there are problems with the normalisation of pornographic representations of sex, but that’s a different argument []

Tags: , , ,

Ideas are not for sharing

So don’t read this.

Seriously, I’m beginning to wonder about our approach to ideas.  There’s a burgeoning fear that ideas will be stolen, that we must do everything in our power to prevent the spread of ideas.  Funny that, because I always thought that ideas were worth sharing (I’ve watched too many TED videos). Okay, not all ideas are worth sharing, but most are.  But we’re starting to lock ideas up behind so many technologies, to make it difficult to share them.  And you know what, I think I’ve finally decided that if you think your idea is so important that you can only share it in a protected document (eg a PDF that is image based rather than text based, thank you very much for that Publishing Houses), well, I’m not going to give it any more airtime.

Seriously, I don’t know why I cannot simply copy and paste from a document, to keep the spirit of the original within sight while I work it into my own ideas.  And every time I find something tied up in copyright protection, I want to delete it.  Protection my left nut!

(Speaking of which, I should probably find a non-copyright protected version of my own thesis (protected despite my request otherwise) and dump it somewhere where it can be useful.)

COPY THESE WORDS: I want to share ideas widely.  I want to find and build upon other ideas easily. I want to stand on the shoulders of giants and know that I could not have gotten there without them.  I want to share and learn! STEAL THIS HYPERTEXT!

Reference: Douglas Eyman, 1996, Hypertext And/As Collaboration in the Computer-Facilitated Writing Classroom, Kairos, 1(2)

EDIT: This is what cheesed me off this morning – an image-based PDF.

yep

No reference provided. There’s enough information there if you want to get cheesed off too.

Theme by RoseCityGardens.com
Modified by Me!