Research Based Assessment Changes Research Based Assessment Changes Feed en-us alisonruth@gmail.com alisonruth@gmail.com EditThisPagePHP 0.8 60 http://vicariousconversations.com/EBA/index.php Current: Research Based AssessmentTrackback ping from http://www.city-tips.info/ Trackback ping from http://www.city-tips.info/ Tue, 26 May 2009 04:16:12 GMT 01243311371 Trackback ping from http://www.city-tips.info/ Modified:Tue, 26 May 2009 04:16:11 GMT <h2>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h2>
<p>
The current discussion concerning the Mandatory ISP Level Filtering proposal in Australia is slated as being undertaken on an 'evidence based approach'. Therefore, using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research">Action Research</a> approach, I aim to determine the problem that people believe this will solve and the best approaches to combat mis-information about the proposal.
</p>
<b>Policy</b>
<p>
There is no coherently stated policy for the implementation of a mandatory filtered feed of World Wide Web pages.
</p>
<b>Issues</b>
<ol>

<li>Protecting children from viewing unsavoury material</li>
<ul>

<li>Everyone has the right to define their own morals</li>

<li>Everyone has the right to different morals</li>

<li>No one has the right to enforce their morals on others</li>

</ul>


<li>Restricting access to <i>illegal material</i></li>
<ul>

<li>Illegal materials are illegal</li>

<li>Legality is subject to change</li>

<li>Different jurisdictions</li>

<li>Defining knowledge as illegal</li>

</ul>


<li>Censorship</li>
<ul>

<li>Restricting access to knowledge</li>

<li>Protecting people from <i>knowledge</i> that may harm them (subjective)</li>

<li>Political speech</li>

</ul>


<li>Other Protocols</li>
<ul>

<li>What Internet protocols are able to be <i>filtered</i>?</li>

<li>How many protocols are there currently?</li>

<li>What about new forms of communication?</li>

</ul>


<li>Cost</li>
<ul>

<li>Who pays?</li>

<li>How much?</li>

<li>Maintaining currency of information?</li>

<li>Opportunity costs?</li>

</ul>


<li>Form of implementation</li>
<ul>

<li>Individual or ISP</li>

<li>Opt in or Opt out</li>

<li>A layered approach (aka mandatory + opt in layer)</li>

<li>By protocol</li>

<li>Illegal or unsavoury</li>

</ul>


<li></li>
</ol>
<b>Key stakeholders</b>
<ol>

<li>Children</li>
<ul>
<li>Definition of Children</li>
<li>Age related content?</li>
<li>Too much knowledge at too young an age?</li>

</ul>


<li>Youth</li>
<ul>
<li>Definition of Youth</li>
<li>Learning potential of networks</li>
<li>Learning about boundaries</li>

</ul>


<li>Young Adults</li>
<ul>
<li>Definition of Young Adults</li>
<li>Independence?<li>
<li>Learning to choose</li>

</ul>


<li>Educators</li>
<ul>
<li>Access to information</li>
<li>Access to sources of relevant knowledge</li>
<li>Age appropriate lessons</li>
<li>Technical skills to maintain computer</li>
<li>Shifts in knowledge formation processes</li>

</ul>


<li>Electorate</li>
<ul>
<li>Adults >18 years</li>
<li>Infantalisation - taking away rights</li>
<li>Free speech</li>
<li>Diversity</li>
<li>Choice (infinite - simpler choices come with censorship)</li>

</ul>


<li>Vendors</li>
<ul>
<li>Vested interest in seeing more use of filters</li>
<li>Filter led recovery?</li>
<li>Fanning moral panic</li>
<li>Obfuscating problems<li>

</ul>


<li>Policy makers</li>
<ul>
<li>Succumbing to Moral panic</li>
<li>Vested interest in maintaining position</li>
<li>Paternalistic - we know what's best</li>
<li>Respond to vocal groups (Lobby groups)</li>
<ul>

<li></li>
</ol>
<b>Perspectives</b>
<ol>

<li>Freedom of Speech</li>

<li>Morality</li>

<li>Election strategies</li>

<li>Cashing in (Vendors)</li>

<li>Fear mongering</li>

<li>Doing the <i>right</i> thing (see above)</li>

<li></li>
</ol>
<p>
__RSS_FEED__
</p>
<p>
__RSS_DIFF_FEED__
</p>
__HIDDEN_AREA_BUTTON__<b>Add comment</b>
<br />
<br />
__HIDDEN_AREA_START__
__COMMENTS__
__COMMENT_FORM__
__TRACKBACKS__
__HIDDEN_AREA_END__
__EDIT_BUTTON__ <b>Edit Page</b>
<div style="clear:both">&nbsp;</div>



Trackbacks

url:
http://www.city-tips.info/
title:
City tips voor de beste links uit jouw woonplaats
excerpt:
De huidige economische crisis kan de streek ook kansen bieden volgens de Terneuzense burgemeester Jan Lonink.
blog_name:
gemeente
time:
2009-05-25 22:16:11 / MDT

]]> Research Based Assessment: index.php Trackback ping from http://www.city-tips.info/ Trackback ping from http://www.city-tips.info/ Tue, 26 May 2009 04:16:11 GMT 1243311371
Trackback ping from http://www.city-tips.info/
Modified:Tue, 26 May 2009 04:16:11 GMT
Added in index.phpRemoved from index.00003.php
<h2>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h2> The current discussion concerning the Mandatory ISP Level Filtering proposal in Australia is slated as being undertaken on an 'evidence based approach'. Therefore, using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research">Action Research</a> approach, we aim to determine the problem that people believe this will solve and the best approaches to combat mis-information about the proposal. <h2>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h2> <p> The current discussion concerning the Mandatory ISP Level Filtering proposal in Australia is slated as being undertaken on an 'evidence based approach'. Therefore, using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research">Action Research</a> approach, I aim to determine the problem that people believe this will solve and the best approaches to combat mis-information about the proposal. </p> <b>Policy</b> <p> There is no coherently stated policy for the implementation of a mandatory filtered feed of World Wide Web pages. </p> <b>Issues</b> <ol> <li>Protecting children from viewing unsavoury material</li> <ul> <li>Everyone has the right to define their own morals</li> <li>Everyone has the right to different morals</li> <li>No one has the right to enforce their morals on others</li> </ul> <li>Restricting access to <i>illegal material</i></li> <ul> <li>Illegal materials are illegal</li> <li>Legality is subject to change</li> <li>Different jurisdictions</li> <li>Defining knowledge as illegal</li> </ul> <li>Censorship</li> <ul> <li>Restricting access to knowledge</li> <li>Protecting people from <i>knowledge</i> that may harm them (subjective)</li> <li>Political speech</li> </ul> <li>Other Protocols</li> <ul> <li>What Internet protocols are able to be <i>filtered</i>?</li> <li>How many protocols are there currently?</li> <li>What about new forms of communication?</li> </ul> <li>Cost</li> <ul> <li>Who pays?</li> <li>How much?</li> <li>Maintaining currency of information?</li> <li>Opportunity costs?</li> </ul> <li>Form of implementation</li> <ul> <li>Individual or ISP</li> <li>Opt in or Opt out</li> <li>A layered approach (aka mandatory + opt in layer)</li> <li>By protocol</li> <li>Illegal or unsavoury</li> </ul> <li></li> </ol> <b>Key stakeholders</b> <ol> <li>Children</li> <ul> <li>Definition of Children</li> <li>Age related content?</li> <li>Too much knowledge at too young an age?</li> </ul> <li>Youth</li> <ul> <li>Definition of Youth</li> <li>Learning potential of networks</li> <li>Learning about boundaries</li> </ul> <li>Young Adults</li> <ul> <li>Definition of Young Adults</li> <li>Independence?<li> <li>Learning to choose</li> </ul> <li>Educators</li> <ul> <li>Access to information</li> <li>Access to sources of relevant knowledge</li> <li>Age appropriate lessons</li> <li>Technical skills to maintain computer</li> <li>Shifts in knowledge formation processes</li> </ul> <li>Electorate</li> <ul> <li>Adults >18 years</li> <li>Infantalisation - taking away rights</li> <li>Free speech</li> <li>Diversity</li> <li>Choice (infinite - simpler choices come with censorship)</li> </ul> <li>Vendors</li> <ul> <li>Vested interest in seeing more use of filters</li> <li>Filter led recovery?</li> <li>Fanning moral panic</li> <li>Obfuscating problems<li> </ul> <li>Policy makers</li> <ul> <li>Succumbing to Moral panic</li> <li>Vested interest in maintaining position</li> <li>Paternalistic - we know what's best</li> <li>Respond to vocal groups (Lobby groups)</li> <ul> <li></li> </ol> <b>Perspectives</b> <ol> <li>Freedom of Speech</li> <li>Morality</li> <li>Election strategies</li> <li>Cashing in (Vendors)</li> <li>Fear mongering</li> <li>Doing the <i>right</i> thing (see above)</li> <li></li> </ol> __HIDDEN_AREA_BUTTON__<b>Add comment</b> <br /> <br /> __HIDDEN_AREA_BUTTON__ __EDIT_BUTTON__ <b>Edit Page</b> __EDIT_BUTTON__  Comments Trackbacks url: http://www.city-tips.info/ title: City tips voor de beste links uit jouw woonplaats excerpt: De huidige economische crisis kan de streek ook kansen bieden volgens de Terneuzense burgemeester Jan Lonink. blog_name: gemeente time: 2009-05-25 22:16:11 / MDT ]]> Research Based Assessment: index.00003.php alisonruth@gmail.com (alison) Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:47:06 GMT 1229935626
Edited by:alisonruth@gmail.com (alison)
Modified:Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:47:06 GMT
Added in index.00003.phpRemoved from index.00002.php
<h1>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h1> <h2>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h2> The current discussion concerning the Mandatory ISP Level Filtering proposal in Australia is slated as being undertaken on an 'evidence based approach'. Therefore, using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research">Action Research</a> approach, we aim to determine the problem that people believe this will solve and the best approaches to combat mis-information about the proposal.  Comments Trackbacks]]> Research Based Assessment: index.00002.php alisonruth@gmail.com (alison) Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:41:34 GMT 1229935294
Edited by:alisonruth@gmail.com (alison)
Modified:Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:41:34 GMT
Added in index.00002.phpRemoved from index.00001.php
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <title>Research Based Assessment</title> __META_RSS_AUTODISCOVERY__ <h1>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h1> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <title>Research Based Assessment</title> __META_RSS_AUTODISCOVERY__  Comments Trackbacks]]> Research Based Assessment: index.00001.php Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:35:38 GMT 1229934938
Modified:Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:35:38 GMT
Added in index.00001.phpRemoved from index.00004.php
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <h2>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h2> The current discussion concerning the Mandatory ISP Level Filtering proposal in Australia is slated as being undertaken on an 'evidence based approach'. Therefore, using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research">Action Research</a> approach, we aim to determine the problem that people believe this will solve and the best approaches to combat mis-information about the proposal. __HIDDEN_AREA_BUTTON__ __HIDDEN_AREA_BUTTON__<b>Add comment</b> <br /> <br /> __EDIT_BUTTON__ __EDIT_BUTTON__ <b>Edit Page</b>  Comments Trackbacks]]> Research Based Assessment: index.00004.php alisonruth@gmail.com (alison) Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:18:50 GMT 1230070730
Edited by:alisonruth@gmail.com (alison)
Modified:Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:18:50 GMT
Added in index.00004.phpRemoved from index.00000.php
<h2>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h2> The current discussion concerning the Mandatory ISP Level Filtering proposal in Australia is slated as being undertaken on an 'evidence based approach'. Therefore, using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research">Action Research</a> approach, we aim to determine the problem that people believe this will solve and the best approaches to combat mis-information about the proposal. <h2>Evidence Based Assessment Using research and analysis</h2> <p> The current discussion concerning the Mandatory ISP Level Filtering proposal in Australia is slated as being undertaken on an 'evidence based approach'. Therefore, using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research">Action Research</a> approach, I aim to determine the problem that people believe this will solve and the best approaches to combat mis-information about the proposal. </p> <b>Policy</b> <p> There is no coherently stated policy for the implementation of a mandatory filtered feed of World Wide Web pages. </p> <b>Issues</b> <ol> <li>Protecting children from viewing unsavoury material</li> <ul> <li>Everyone has the right to define their own morals</li> <li>Everyone has the right to different morals</li> <li>No one has the right to enforce their morals on others</li> </ul> <li>Restricting access to <i>illegal material</i></li> <ul> <li>Illegal materials are illegal</li> <li>Legality is subject to change</li> <li>Different jurisdictions</li> <li>Defining knowledge as illegal</li> </ul> <li>Censorship</li> <ul> <li>Restricting access to knowledge</li> <li>Protecting people from <i>knowledge</i> that may harm them (subjective)</li> <li>Political speech</li> </ul> <li>Other Protocols</li> <ul> <li>What Internet protocols are able to be <i>filtered</i>?</li> <li>How many protocols are there currently?</li> <li>What about new forms of communication?</li> </ul> <li>Cost</li> <ul> <li>Who pays?</li> <li>How much?</li> <li>Maintaining currency of information?</li> <li>Opportunity costs?</li> </ul> <li>Form of implementation</li> <ul> <li>Individual or ISP</li> <li>Opt in or Opt out</li> <li>A layered approach (aka mandatory + opt in layer)</li> <li>By protocol</li> <li>Illegal or unsavoury</li> </ul> <li></li> </ol> <b>Key stakeholders</b> <ol> <li>Children</li> <li>Youth</li> <li>Young Adults</li> <li>Educators</li> <li>Electorate</li> <li>Vendors</li> <li>Policy makers</li> <li></li> </ol> <b>Perspectives</b> <ol> <li>Freedom of Speech</li> <li>Morality</li> <li>Election strategies</li> <li>Cashing in (Vendors)</li> <li>Fear mongering</li> <li>Doing the <i>right</i> thing (see above)</li> <li></li> </ol>  Comments Trackbacks]]> Research Based Assessment: index.00000.php alisonruth@gmail.com (alison) Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:22:03 GMT 1230607323
Edited by:alisonruth@gmail.com (alison)
Modified:Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:22:03 GMT
Added in index.00000.phpRemoved from index.00005.php
<li>Youth</li> <li>Young Adults</li> <li>Educators</li> <li>Electorate</li> <li>Vendors</li> <li>Policy makers</li> <ul> <li>Definition of Children</li> <li>Age related content?</li> <li>Too much knowledge at too young an age?</li> </ul> <li>Youth</li> <ul> <li>Definition of Youth</li> <li>Learning potential of networks</li> <li>Learning about boundaries</li> </ul> <li>Young Adults</li> <ul> <li>Definition of Young Adults</li> <li>Independence?<li> <li>Learning to choose</li> </ul> <li>Educators</li> <ul> <li>Access to information</li> <li>Access to sources of relevant knowledge</li> <li>Age appropriate lessons</li> <li>Technical skills to maintain computer</li> <li>Shifts in knowledge formation processes</li> </ul> <li>Electorate</li> <ul> <li>Adults >18 years</li> <li>Infantalisation - taking away rights</li> <li>Free speech</li> <li>Diversity</li> <li>Choice (infinite - simpler choices come with censorship)</li> </ul> <li>Vendors</li> <ul> <li>Vested interest in seeing more use of filters</li> <li>Filter led recovery?</li> <li>Fanning moral panic</li> <li>Obfuscating problems<li> </ul> <li>Policy makers</li> <ul> <li>Succumbing to Moral panic</li> <li>Vested interest in maintaining position</li> <li>Paternalistic - we know what's best</li> <li>Respond to vocal groups (Lobby groups)</li> <ul>  Comments Trackbacks]]>