Posts Tagged ‘blogging’

Talking to myself

I’ve started a number of posts over the last few days, but not gotten around to finishing them.  It’s kind of testing the ideas on paper (or the screen or whatever metaphor you want to use).  I think I’m talking to myself.  It’s partly the idea that this here bloggy thing is all about what I find interesting, or at least workable.  Obviously, not every thing I start writing is workable.  I have some ideas that when I put down, I realise that they don’t quite work.  There’s some basic premise that’s missing.  So I leave them there.  In drafts.  Perhaps I’ll get back to them.

I have gone back over them occasionally and worked out that some would just never come together and I delete them, one or two have been worthwhile pushing through but there is still a whole heap of them that haven’t been rejected or moved forward yet.  I suppose that’s part of my internal conversation with myself and the blog is part of the external conversation.

I want to keep working on the idea that a blog is more about collaborating with yourself, even while it’s also opening up to others.  There’s a kind of reflexivity that comes with writing and I know I don’t do enough.  I guess the idea of writing is now so bound up in what I do for a living, that the fun has gone out of it.  How do I get that back?

Perhaps I should just push some of my less fully formed ideas out and let them float.  I don’t know.

I have way too many interests to maintain a coherent framework in this forum.  Which perhaps suggests I need an incoherent framework.

To quote myself: “flooble”!

Tags: ,

Blogging for yourself

I have this idea for a paper but I’m not sure where it’s going.  I started writing it years ago and have somehow managed to commit myself to it for my annual review.  The paper is about blogging but I am now more interested in the notion of collaborating with yourself in a blog – getting back to the notion of journaling as a process of developing one’s ideas.  Then I realised that I’m very slack at doing that exact thing, even though I know there is value in it.  I think one of the things that prevents me is the fear of getting into a two digit readership.  This blog is for me (and anyone else who happens to stumble upon it) and it’s supposed to be where I develop my ideas.  But I’m slack.

Part of the idea of doing this is getting those little bits of writing done.  Engaging with literature and thoughts and all manner of things (that aren’t thoughts or literature … is there anything else?).  But I keep hesitating.  It’s as if future me doesn’t matter.  But I want to talk to future me.  That’s what this is all about.  Having a blog or a journal is leaving notes for yourself, talking to future you.  Those thoughts can be revisited while helping to measure change in ideas, growth of knowledge and shifts in perspective.  I want to document them.  I want to be able to come back, but I’m too much the vicarious participant.  If I love reading so much, what’s happened to my writing?

As we near the end of our semester, I’m going to commit to more regular updates, find something worth commenting on, talk to myself, because, really, this is about me.  If you also find something of value, then, hey, that’s great.  But I’m talking to myself now.

Tags: ,

Life as a blog

I’ve been thinking recently about the ideas behind blogging. From what I can gather, the original theory of blogs (if there ever was one) was to keep track of what you were finding. In fact, Tim Berners-Lee highlighted that exact problem in his proposal – how to keep track of ‘stuff’ (the technical term). Since then we have things like delicious and CiteULike that help us keep track.

But everytime I go looking for something, I seem to have problems. You see, we change, but our blogs don’t. Blogs, bookmarks and all our other online paraphernalia seem to show us our growth. They are a part of our conversation with ourselves. I find it quite interesting to look back over the few years I’ve been using these and see the changes, not only in the kinds of things I’m bookmarking, but also in the ways I was thinking. It’s almost like real life! I get the sense of what was important, what was perceived to be important, but was is now not necessarily important. I kind of like that. It’s revealing.

That leaves the question: do I really want people knowing me that well? Probably not, or I’d blog more!

Tags: , ,

moving spaces

I blog HERE now.

Not that I update very often, but it is very official like.

Tags:

reflections on blogging in too many places

So I started this journal in some attempt to develop some research interests in blogging. It was supposed to be the place where I separated my work from my play. Here I was going to post lofty thoughts and theoretical insights, and be incredibly clever, all the while maintaining my inane side in my other journal. I figured that the stuff I didn’t want people to know would go over there, and here would be some semblance of intelligence.

Twere not to be. You see, instead of being able to neatly separate the personal from the political (or whatever phrase is current), I merely slowed down on both fronts. The theoretical separation of personal and research became a gulf. Many times, as I went to post in either place, I felt restrained cos a) it was too personal for here, or b) it was too deep for there. In the end, I barely posted in either place.

Now I know that some people have both private and public journals, some apparently languishing (like both of mine did) and there are one or two contemplating this kind of schizm. My daughter did the same thing (and has done it yet again with her film journal), but her academic journal remains dormant (her other journals also remain dormant, but she’s trying to finish her dissertation goddammit!).

So I think I’m kinda interested, in an un-official academic way (not academic as in let’s publish this, but more an academic this is an opportunity to understand this phenomena (which is just as well cos I’m good at the latter but seem to be missing it completely on the former (can we say oh noes, tenure coming up, pull ya frelling finger out!!??))).

So, those of you who have attempted said schizm and those contemplating schizming, what were/are your reasons? Do you think you will be able to maintain the distinction between the journals? How did you/will you bow out if it doesn’t seem to do what you thought it might do? Is that even a valid question?

BTW while this journal has languished rather unloved, it will continue to do so. I’m going back to my original journal, which I have just renamed (cos the old name was kinda inane, picked because I couldn’t get what I wanted at the time, only to find that it really isn’t what I wanted anyway and it only took more than four years to figure that out). You are very welcome to friend that journal and I will reciprocate. I’m not big into commenting, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t value your insights, differences and thoughts. I still think there’s something to be drawn out from the vicarious interactor, which reminds me, I should finish writing that paper.

Oh, my other journal? ([info deleted] who said I couldn’t still be inane?) And this journal may still get an occassional post of the deep and meaningful kind. I’ll see how it goes.

Tags: ,

Theme by RoseCityGardens.com
Modified by Me!