Posts Tagged ‘gender’

Happy New Year … or something

So it’s the end of one arbitrarily defined time period and the beginning of another.  I often question why we have this moment when everything becomes new again, or so the theory goes.  What does it mean when everything is focused into one moment?

Over the last few years, I’ve found it much more compelling to contemplate the sunrise on the first of January.  That seems more indicative of newness to me.  I know there are all sorts of old traditions that dictate that midnight is symbolic, but that symbolism seems less relevant in our current age.  I don’t know of anyone who still celebrates with the First Foot so why do other traditions persist when some fall by the wayside?

I was just discussing traditions with a friend and we were pondering the nature of changes in what’s defined as appropriate, both online and off, and we both expressed concern over the remaking of the female image under a male gaze.  It raises questions about what changes have happened and are now being pushed forward.  Things like defining the naked body as only sexual.  I keep hearing comments from our so-called leaders about how disgusting certain images are, and now topless sunbathing is being labelled as revolting.  Personally, I think sunbathing is revolting but that’s because I live in Queensland, the skin cancer captial of the world.  It’s not the topless part that’s the problem, it’s the framing of attractiveness and health in terms of suntan.  I think that is the problem.

The whole reframing of the body was a part of the feminist movement, but it’s been usurped by the far-right.  Think about brazillians and the implication of pre-pubescence that comes with that.  The hairlessness of our current standards of beauty evoke immaturity – an immature female body.  Now who’s being disgusting?

So I really think it’s important that we not implement puritanical standards of imagery on the web.  I really think that there is a line and we are so far from it, that it’s unlikely we will cross it[1].  We need to become comfortable with ourselves.  Our politicians are not.  I hope they loosen up and realise that their morality is not mine (and probably not yours).  I will work towards keeping our ability to appreciate the human body, it does, after all, have a certain beauty, but one that is being manipulated by so many different forces that it will be hard to unravel.

In this new year, lets contemplate the ways in which we have moved forward, and the forces that are holding us back, both personally and socially.  Oh, and don’t forget politically.  Those forces should never be ignored.

Have a good one!

  1. of course, if you manipulate your search terms, you can find some pretty disgusting stuff, but generally, you won’t find it if you don’t go looking and you don’t have spyware on your computer []

Tags: , ,

Ideas and control … how are they linked?

I was listening to something on the radio and it got me thinking. A century ago, people started being recognised as people. It took a while and we haven’t completed that task, but with the beginnings of the shift of enfranchisement to include others besides powerful men, we started down a track which has led to here. Where is here? Well, here is where we have people with (almost) equal rights. I say (almost) because there are still portions of various societies that still view members of that society as lesser members. Not as good as the powerful members. People having fewer rights, fewer options, fewer possibilities to grow.

Concurrently, we had this burgeoning of ideas. The last century has seen a flurry of intellectual growth, ideation, information. Are these two linked? I’m not enough of a historian to determine that. But, and this is my point, with the increase of both ‘rights’ and ‘ideas’ and a decrease in ‘control’ of people, there seems to have been a shift to the control of ideas.

How has this happened? How is it that the powerful people of a century ago have shifted their control of ‘others’ to the control of ‘ideas’? We no longer condone the ‘ownership of people’ but we now have this notion of ‘ownership of ideas’ and frankly, if I try to own an idea, the only way I can control it is by not sharing. If I share an idea, it’s not just mine, it’s ours. I think this means I believe that ‘intellectual property’ is a crock!

And that I gladly share with you.

Tags: , ,

Wow – Computerworld story about the BOOK!

Computerworld – Book looks at IT’s chic appeal to attract girl power

Entrance - balloon walkway

I’ve been meaning to blog about this, but with the launch on the weekend, and semester starting last week, I haven’t done it yet. I’m so proud of Jenine’s effort in this, and the attention it’s getting.

See my Flickr for images of the prelaunch fun and games. And the book has it’s own Flickr too.

Tags: , , ,

This is seriously borked!

In a class of their own: teaching tailored for the guys

http://url.edna.edu.au/5t4R

A boys-only kindergarten class at Bowen Public School in Orange is one of the first in NSW and is part of a strategy to tailor teaching to the special learning needs of boys. “It is beneficial to the boys in terms of self-esteem not to have the competitiveness of girls in the class and the ‘miss perfects’ who can often be a threat to boys and undermine their self-confidence,” according to teacher, Steve Jackson.
Sydney Morning Herald, 3 October 2006

C’mon! Don’t they get enough in life? We haven’t yet leveled the playing field and it’s being tipped back towards boys? Seriously!

If they are having boys only classes, where are the girls only classes? What about the research that says boys learn better in mixed classes than girls, while girls learn better in single sex classes? I really can’t understand the need for single-sex classes for boys at the pre-school level. And I’m flabbergasted that girls have been repositioned as competitive because they are quiet! All the talk about getting girls to loosen up, to participate in class and that’s now seen as an attempt to undermine boys?

Sheesh! The world turneth in bizarre ways.

Tags: ,

Theme by RoseCityGardens.com
Modified by Me!