Posts Tagged ‘internet’

The google generation

The lecture I presented yesterday morning, about problem solving, was fairly well received.  At one point, we were talking about how search engines solve particular problems and I introduced some visual interfaces to search (KartOO and Quintura).  As part of the discussion, I asked how many students used search engines other than Google.  No-one put their hand up.  Not one.  Out of about 200 students.

They really are the Google Generation.

Tags: ,

Evidence based approach?

Senator Conroy is on record as saying

The government intends to take an evidence based approach to this issue. The results of the live pilot will inform the government’s policy in this area. (Senate, 13 November, 2008)

A number of questions arise from this statement.

  1. What is an evidenced based approach?
  2. What evidence will the live pilot produce?

I’m not an expert in Evidence Based Medicine from which Evidence Based Policy (and I’m assuming, an evidence based approach to policy) arises. I do remember reading a critique of EBM somewhere online, but as it’s only a side issue for me, I did not bookmark nor record that particular piece of ‘evidence’. I do, however, have some skills in searching out evidence, skills I used to find some critiques of evidence based methodologies.

One of the most interesting finds was a paper on Evidence Based Policy which looks specifically at the Australian context. It was noted in that paper there are many forms of evidence including

Expert knowledge; published research, existing research; stakeholder consultations; previous policy evaluations; the Internet; outcomes from consultations; costings of policy options; output from economic and statistical modelling (UK Cabinet Office, 1999 quoted in Marston and Watts, 2003, p145)

This is not an exhaustive list, but gives some idea of the kinds of ‘knowledge’ that can be used within the process of making policy. Marston and Watts make the claim that “the meaning and practice of ‘evidence-based policy’ are contested” (2203, p143). Knowledge is also highly contested[1] and hierarchical, with scientific, objective forms of research contributing more strongly than other forms of empirical data (including expert knowledge derived from practice – that is, that developed by Systems Administrators who daily engage with the concepts under contestation).

Marston and Watts (2003, p150-1) give the following list as the “core features of all evidence-based arguments“:

  • an implied or identified question
  • a claim or proposition that such and such is the case or that such and such explains or renders intelligible
  • the evidence adduced in support of that claim or proposition
  • a set of assumptions that have assisted in a) shaping the question, b) selecting what will count as the relevant evidence and c) which then link the evidence to the claim by means of conceptual processes that warrant the proposed link between the claim and the evidence actually advanced.

Let’s apply these to the current debate.

Read more of Evidence based approach?

  1. and if you contest that you prove my point []

Tags: ,

Senator Conroy doesn’t want you to see …

this pair of nice boobies[1].

A pair of blue-footed boobies in the Galapgos Islands

A pair of blue-footed boobies in the Galapagos Islands by Eugene on Flickr

It seems the planned Australian Filter has hit mainstream news.  Not that I watch much of that, but it’s been bubbling around the intarwebs for a while.

I always think about the false positives that are going to happen.  The biggest area, in my mind, that will be affected is the birds.  No more nice boobies.  Admittedly, there are a few bird names that kids giggle over.

It reminds me of when I was much younger and we only had books.  We used to look words up in the dictionary.  You can be sure I would have been googling words, but we were fairly limited.  I mean, I remember looking up the word ‘fart‘ only to find it’s definition was sadly lacking and puritan: an explosion between the legs.  WTF?  I mean, there’s way more to it than that, but that was the only definition we had.

The other incident that springs to mind when I think about this is when I was working in a regional uni and introducing school kids to this new fangled internet. It would have been 1998/9.  I was watching a group of young girls looking up the Spice Girls.  Innocent enough, but the search also returned ‘spicy girls’ – not exactly what they were looking for.  After they clicked on one link and got something that was, to them, rather disappointing, the student teacher who was working directly with them totally freaked out.  I think she almost wanted to put herself between these innocent children and these images.  As I was standing behind the group at the time, I leaned over to the girls and said something like, oh bother, that’s not what you want, hit the back button.  The kids were very happy to comply because they didn’t want that, they had more sense than the student teacher!  It wasn’t a big deal to them.  They knew what they wanted!

It still peeves me that that woman will be transferring her puritan ideals to a whole new group of children.  Please think of the children, let them grow and explore.  Let them find the information they need to become well adjusted.  Don’t block their access to everything!

  1. I find it ironic that these boobies have no heads []

Tags: , ,

Reading, writing, arithmetic and … something else

I’ve recently finished a paper on the use of email in organisational contexts and I keep coming to a point of dis-cognition, cognitive dissonance, if you will.  Most of what I do, read and research is the advanced application of literacy skills – how to read web-pages, how to negotiate email, how to function in an almost always online way.  And then I come across research which talks about functional literacy at a much lower level, particularly in developing countries and I have to wonder why I am so concerned about high levels of literacy – the kind needed for advanced use of computers.  It seems to be irrelevant in the face of so many obstacles elsewhere.

And then it seems like a bit of a wank to overly worry about the differences in development of various countries, because I’m located here.  This is my context.  The context of deeply embedded media in my life.  I watch a whole heap of things on youtube, gathering ideas for lectures.  I seek information from all over to add value to the lessons I give my students.

This week’s lecture uses Social Networks in Plain English, Who’s watching YOUR space?, The business of social networks, and Facebook killed the private life.  I was going to use Winds of Change, but I’ll save that for the new business models lecture.

future path

I seem to have wandered off on a tangent.  It’s like following a whole heap of links and not really knowing how you got there. Which is kind of the point really.  Luke and I have been coming up with ideas of how we read online (following on from the paper I’m about to submit) and I think.  We flit from link to link.  And it’s that notion of literacy again.  I think I shall call it flitteracy – the literacy of flitting around the web.

Tags: , ,

Elitism

I was reading an interesting snippet on Techdirt about people and the Internet which echoed and reverberated among things I have been thinking.

I’m becoming aware of the strange world in which I live. I spend a great deal of time, fiddling on the Internet. I say fiddling, because I read my friends pages which heaps of feeds from other blogs, although I’m not particularly regular about updating this journal. I live in a world that is almost hypereal. I’m not sure if that word is right. I know it has specific meanings within specific disciplines and I am not in those disciplines. But, I sense that when I walk around in the real world, that the people around me may not even be aware of the things that I know. There’s a vague schism between what my reality is and what everyone else experiences. I’m very hyperconnected, even if I’m not hyper-inter-connected. I sense a strange discontinuity between myself and these other people.

Then I read my friends page, both here and elsewhere, and I sense a different kind of schism. It’s one that has its nexus in education, knowing phrases that seem esoteric and are easily misheard (button down the hatches, people). There’s a sense that when I think, it’s almost in hyper-terms, in ways that other people may not be aware. There’s an extra level of awareness about the context in which I do things. Beyond everyday living, I can critique basic facts about life and living. I can choose to go outside the perceived norms of an externally imposed reality (Does this mean I’m insane?). Perhaps it’s the way in which I am aware of the perceived norms of society, that social pressures don’t necessarily effect me in the same way as others. Sure, I can choose to engage in some practices that appear to be accepting of social norms. But I’m very aware that I am choosing them.

I’ve thought recently about the possibility of working in other countries, particularly non-Western countries. But I don’t think I would do that because I know the norms here, I know the consequences of stepping outside them. I can deal with that. But knowing the norms and knowing that I can choose or choose not to step outside them, provides a further sense to that hyper-ness of my life. It’s different. I am online, I am educated. Heck, I have a PhD in online communication. The sense that I have of people in my University not being aware of the nature of the Internet and then lots of people on the internet aware of the kinds of education available means that my circle of peers (in the narrowest sense of that word) is very limited.

But getting back to the Techdirt piece, I still find it strange that people don’t have the internet. What do they do with their spare time? Perhaps it’s the housework that I can cheerfully ignore while my screen provides further entertainment.

Tags: , ,

Theme by RoseCityGardens.com
Modified by Me!