Posts Tagged ‘research’

Hedgehogs, Foxes and the Internet Filter Debate

A recent journal alert led me on a fox and hedgehog chase.  I came across a paper called The Hedgehog and the Fox: A Discussion of the Approaches to the Analysis of ICT Reforms in Teacher Education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström.  It’s a bit of a mouthful of a title, but as my interests do lie in the area of ICT reforms and education, I downloaded it and read it.  What struck me most was this explanation of the first part of the title.

… Isaiah Berlin (1998) began by quoting Greek poet Archilochus: “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing” (p. 437). Berlin used these words to describe people as being either like a hedgehog or like a fox. Hedgehogs are those people who pursue one idea thoroughly and who develop an integrated or universal principle. Foxes, on the other hand, are people who pursue many ideas and who seldom stay long with one before trying out another. These people are pluralistic; they move on many levels and draw on a variety of experiences. (p84)

While the paper does describe the reactions to reforms of teacher education using computer technology, the conceptualisation of foxes and hedgehogs lead me to consider other areas where computer technology approaches are dichotomised, namely the Internet Filtering debate we are currently engaged in within Australia.
Read more of Hedgehogs, Foxes and the Internet Filter Debate

Tags: , ,

W00t! Another Paper!

I was just checking to see when the next edition of the International Journal of Organisational Behaviour would be out and apparently it’s up.  My paper about email’s potential contribution to bullying is up (PDF).

I wrote that paper in about 3 days, so it’s definitely not my best work, but it’s now in print (electrons?) which is what counts in my line of work.

Now I really should tidy up my list of publications.

Tags:

Video as data

One of my research interests is exploring the varied relationships people have with their technology.  I have been trying to work out a process for exploring this in a way that allows me to dig deeper into these relationships, but besides working out a survey and perhaps watching people, I haven’t come up with a good approach that doesn’t put people on edge because they feel less than comfortable with their level of knowledge which is ironic given that I’m interested in how they learn.

But I was watching the Ludlum/Conroy video and it occurred to me that we see Conroy interacting with his computer in that clip.  Admittedly, there isn’t much to go on but he at least seemed comfortable using the down arrow key.  I think I saw a mouse beside the laptop, but he didn’t use that in that clip.  It occurred to me that there is potentially a heap of, dare I say, ‘evidence’ of the kinds of interactions I’m interested on YouTube and other video sites.

On the face of that one clip, I can conclude that we have a very non-tech savvy Senate.  There were perhaps three (visible) computers that I could see within the chamber – one in front of Conroy, one with Ludlam and one other with, I’m assuming[1], support people.

While videos of people intereacting with their computers may actually be a rich source of data for my research[2], I do not think watching the Senate will contribute much. I might also end up having a brain haemorrhage having to listen to Conroy over and over and over[3].  Oh, but turn down the sound and we see Conroy exhibiting very different mannerisms while reading his canned response to that when he reponds to the follow ons from Ludlum.  Interesting indeed.

  1. and demonstrating my lack of precise knowledge about the Senate []
  2. I will definitely need to investigate the ethical position on this. []
  3. I’m only on my third viewing and already I feel sick []

Tags: , ,

Flitteracy: literacy for the web

There are so many different ways of thinking about what it is we do.  The paper that I’ve just finished ended up being more about literacy than I expected.  It started out as an analysis of the Beijing ticketing scam and become so much more.  It lead to all sorts of Thought Bunnies (TM) hopping in and out of my head.

Luke and I were rabbiting on the other day about fliters and conceptions and all kinds of framings and reframings of what we do when we’re reading on the web.  We came up with conceptions as a kind of MetaFilter (but not that metafilter).  We filter all sorts of things, piecing them together as we may. It just seemed that our research areas (Problem solving and Web stuff) were coming together, but we’re still not sure how.

We tried rich pictures and ended up with two conceptions of conceptions.  There’s something here and it seems that reading web pages (or Flitteracy) is a problem that must be solved somehow by each of us, although there are many things that remain true (ish) for all of us.

How are we filtering the web?

And that’s where I get stuck.  We have this problem of sense-making, which each of us do individually, but we also do together.  The very nature of the web means that it is a communal ‘thing’.  We flit from site to site and build our own rich picture of information, but what is it that propels us through this web.  Is it a push factor or a pull factor?  We could be pushed away because where we are is not living up to our expectations, or we could be pulled somewhere by the promise of something more shiny.  Perhaps that’s why I like tabbed browsing so much.  If something pulls me away, entices me with ‘teh shineh’, I can always find my way back simply by closing the tab.  I can find a new path, a new way forward.

Heh, we don’t have an information superhighway – we have an information flitterway!

Tags: ,

Doing the other things that interest me

I’ve spent the week (well most of it) finishing off the design of the Campus Club website.  It’s the first site I’ve designed since early in my PhD (aside from this one and it still needs work).   I love playing with web design but I just don’t have much time.  And because I don’t have much time, it takes me ages to remember everything.  Someone suggested I have an eye for design, but I’m not sure.  It usually takes multiple insights from other people to get it to a point that really looks good.  Which is ironic, because I ask people what they thing and they say yeah, that looks good.  My niece suggested on an earlier version that it needed more black.  I think it wasn’t MySpace enough, but we ended with more green to evoke the bush feeling around the club.  It’s a great place to have a few on Friday arvos.

The design still has to be passed by the committee, and it’s anybodies guess whether they will see it in the same light as Laurence (the manager) and me.  Laurence actually had a lot of input into the colouring, which I think finally works well.  Very earthy.

I’m also trying to finish the last few changes on a paper that’s been accepted to IJOB.  I’m pleased the paper was accepted, but I’m not still not sure of the contribution it’s made.  I suppose it’s mainly that it brings some disparate views together and highlights processes and strategies that could improve the use of email in organisations.  I’m not sure why, but that’s the part I always get stuck on … my contribution to knowledge.  I know I struggled with that in my PhD and just about all the other papers I’ve written (except for Wiki Pedagogy – see Wiki Pedagogy in colour that one was easy).

The reviewers want to see that part more clearly.  Now if only I could see it myself.

Tags: ,

Theme by RoseCityGardens.com
Modified by Me!