Posts Tagged ‘thesis’

Teaching as conversation

In my previous post, Defining Learning, I defined learning as a social process.  One of the interesting things about social processes is that it is made up of conversations.  We hear so much about ‘conversation’ now, but learning has always been this way, even though many of our learning systems seem to be centred around monologues where the teacher teaches and the learners learn, but do so quietly. But even when learners are seemingly passive, they are often engaged in processes similar to conversation, the so-called ‘self-talk’.  But I get ahead of myself.

Having defined learning, I start to unpack the ‘conjoined activities’ of teaching and learning because neither is done in a vacuum and although both can occur without the other.

Read more of Teaching as conversation

Related posts

Tags: , ,

Defining Learning

In my thesis, I had a brief paragraph about Burke’s Pentad, but I didn’t really discuss that until about halfway through Chapter 2.  I’ll ignore that paragraph for now and include it when I get to the relevant section.

In the last post, Interpersonal Interactions, I started to discuss what I mean by interaction.  Within learning environments, it is very much an interpersonal process.  Seeing as the focus of my research is the way people learn, it’s important to have some definition of what we mean by learning.  I think the whole of my thesis (all 280+ pages) helps to define learning, particularly mediated learning, but in order to create a shared understanding of learning, I need to establish how I view it.  I welcome comments that aid in the elaboration of this social process. Read more of Defining Learning

Tags: , ,

Interpersonal Interactions

One of the central parts of my research was (is) interpersonal interactions.  Given that interaction is now often more likely to mean ‘interacting with a computer’, I qualify interactions by pointing to the interpersonal nature of interactions between people.  Later in my thesis, I attempt to define the distinctions between interactions between people and interaction with an artefact (ie a computer).  I’m not sure that I have a clear picture of those differences, nor a good set of terminology that distinguishes them.  However, there are distinct differences between the various forms of interaction.  Hence the discussion of interpersonal interactions. Read more of Interpersonal Interactions

Tags: , ,

Interactions in learning

The second chapter of my thesis started focusing on the research in mediated learning.  When I wrote it, the central idea was that online learning environments needed to foster interaction between people.  There seems to some assumptions (that are still floating around, although not so strongly) that putting things online would be cheaper, easier and able to do more with fewer resources (most likely the teacher’s time).  These assumptions are not borne out by experience or the research.  Teaching online is very intensive and takes much practice to get right.  The biggest difference between now and when I wrote my thesis is that I believe all teaching (face-to-face, online and blended) is very intensive and takes much practice to get right.

The quote by Suchman still holds but I’d expand it to include all interactions, between people and machines and between people.  I don’t think it yet holds for interactions between machines, but I can’t say that that will remain the case.  I’ve highlighted the part of the quote that holds particularly for interactions between people – the tension between the writer’s intent and the reader’s intent.

First, that the problem of mutual intelligibility between humans and machines recommends a research agenda aimed less at the creation of interactive machines, than at the writing of dynamic artefacts intended to be legible, or intelligible to their users.  This shift brings a rich set of resources from recent reconceptualizations of what writing and reading involve, including the inevitable uncertainties in relations of writer’s intentions to readers’ interpretations, and the active role of the reader in giving life and meaning to the text.  And this approach encourages us to explore and articulate the particular dynamics of computational artefacts, and what new possibilities those dynamics afford. (Suchman, 1997, italics added)

There are many interpretations of any text which gives rise to the need to explore the dynamics of people interacting, because we do not yet completely understand that, particularly with the interaction of different cultures across the globe.  The direction of my research remains the same – how do we mediate learning and how can we understand those processes.  There’s a series of posts coming up on those ideas based mainly on my theoretical chapter, but also looking toward the future. Read more of Interactions in learning

Related posts

Tags: , ,

Online learning environments

This section of my thesis started to elaborate some of the issues of working online via a computer.  I have deleted a section, indicated below, because I’m not convinced it was completely right.  Nevertheless, the conceptualisation of interaction with a computer is here.  I should stress at this point, that I view interaction as a term to be between people, unless otherwise noted.  Later in the thesis, I elaborate this. Read more of Online learning environments

Related posts

Tags: , ,

Theme by RoseCityGardens.com
Modified by Me!